FOR AN ILLAWARRA REGIONAL FORESHORES PARK
This Regional Park has the potential to provide open space and recreation for the people of the Illawarra and south-western Sydney, as well as attracting NSW, interstate and international tourists. If fully implemented the concept would provide significant direct and indirect local employment opportunities and economic benefits.
The Sandon Point site is an Aboriginal meeting place known as Kuradji, used for thousands of years by coastal and mountain tribes, who came down the still-existing Escarpment track to the headland between two lagoons.
The Sandon Point site is crucial to the proposal, as it provides for public transport access by railway at Thirroul station, and is at the bottom of Bulli Pass for those arriving by car or bus. The site contains outstanding natural features, Aboriginal and European heritage values, and is highly visible from the Escarpment lookouts. Several cleared areas at the site might be suitable for a visitors centre, interpretive centre, carparking, and bike hire, facilities which would need to be located at the northern entrance to the regional park. The site is linked by the Throsby Track to the Illawarra Escarpment State Recreation Area.
The Sandon Point site is the last remaining coastal open space area in the northern Illawarra. It is the only remaining green link between the ocean and the Escarpment. The wetland contains extensive grasslands and wet swales which are habitat for migratory birds listed under international agreements, flora and fauna species and an ecological community listed under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act and the Federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. The Turpentine forest at the site is listed on the Wollongong City Council heritage register.
Sandon Point - Kuradji is the site that welcomes visitors to the Illawarra.
Justification for the required expenditure of the purchase of the Sandon Point site is outlined below. This proposal provides a vision for the future of the Illawarra, rather than a short-term money making venture such as is proposed in association with the residential development of the site by Stockland Trust Group.
CASE FOR AN ILLAWARRA REGIONAL FORESHORES PARK
The NPWS Regional Parks Policy Statement (1997) states that "There are also direct economic benefits for local communities, particularly in terms of employment".
The Stocklands Development would create a small number of jobs for builders during construction. The people who buy these dwellings would most probably have to work in Sydney due to the lack of jobs in the Illawarra. As such, economic flow-on effects from the increased population would be lessened as the residents would most likely purchase clothing, household items, etc. and services such as haircuts in Sydney where choice is greater. The development would add very few jobs to the Illawarra in the long term.
The Stocklands Development would greatly detract from tourism within the area, as the proposed medium density housing links Thirroul with Bulli, removing the "village" and open space visual aspect of the area. This development would be highly visible from Bulli Pass and the Escarpment scenic lookouts, and would dominate the landscape along the bicycle/walking track. Why would people want to visit an area which looks just like an extension of the suburbs of Sydney? The development not only adds nothing to tourism in the region, it greatly detracts from tourism potential.
The Stocklands Development would place housing near creeks at just above the peak maximum flood level, and would add increased runoff to the creeks. The development would do nothing to alleviate flooding in the area.
The Stocklands Development would provide some few short-term jobs and a small flow-on economic benefit to the region, however, it would reduce income to the region from tourism. Increased pressure on services such as schools, hospitals, roads and sewerage would be a cost paid by all residents. The permanent loss of environmental and heritage values is a massive cost, one which is difficult to quantify. Only Stocklands would benefit from the development. Overall, the costs to the region would be greater than the benefits.
The Stocklands Development would be clearly visible from the Escarpment and Bulli Pass, as well as from Sandon Point headland and the cycle/walking track. The small block/large house medium density development does not allow space for the planting of trees in the house yards, and so the development will never improve visually. The development will remove the village aspect of the area, changing this site to more resemble a suburb of Sydney. If this development proceeds, the area will never again be visually attractive.
The Stocklands Development will require the improvement or amplification of existing services such as schools, hospitals, roadways, trains, parking at shopping centres, sewerage and water supply. These costs will be paid by all residents. Currently workday peak hour train services are not sufficient for all passengers to have a seat, and roads from Heathcote into Sydney are overloaded with workers commuting from the Illawarra to Sydney. These services would be strained by the extra load. Current services could not supply the increase in population which would result from this development.
The Stocklands Development proposes to provide lighting along the cycle/walking track and landscape with low plants and few trees only. The lighting would negatively impact on fauna utilising the wetlands. The landscaping plan is directly at odds with the promise to restore the endangered ecological community at the site. Crime and crime prevention appears to be a problem for the developer.
The Stocklands Development would increase the amount of traffic using local roads. Much of the traffic from the development would travel along residential streets which contain schools, in order to reach the expressway south. Traffic congestion at the lower end of Bulli Pass would be greatly exacerbated at peak periods. The development would change local streets into throughroads, increasing the risk to locals and school children.
The Stocklands Development would forever destroy the old tramway / railway embankment, and prevent the use of this as a cycle/walkway link from the ocean to the escarpment. European heritage would be lost from the site forever.
The Stocklands Development would cover a sacred site with residential housing, and build close to the sacred burial site. The development would destroy forever a sacred site, and demonstrates a complete lack of respect for indigenous cultural and religious beliefs.
The Stocklands Development would result in the destruction of an endangered ecological community, a native grassland, a wetland, and habitat for many native invertebrates, frogs, reptiles, birds and other small mammals. The development proposes house and road construction right up to, and in some places into, the endangered ecological community. The increase in numbers of local children, dogs, and cats roaming the wetlands and ecological community would ensure the local extinction of many species, including species listed under the EPBC Act and the TSC Act. The development would forever destroy the flora and fauna of the only remaining undeveloped area which links the ocean with the escarpment.
The Stocklands Development aims to channelise and re-direct creeks in the wetland from their natural regimes. Riparian and wetland vegetation would be destroyed by landscaping, trampling and stormwater management measures. Natural wetland function and ecology would be lost.
The Stocklands Development would provide off-line stormwater treatment, however, the proposed design of the water quality treatment does not aim to remove more than 40% of pollutants, even during low rainfall events. Urban runoff would include pesticides, herbicides and nutrients from garden fertilisers. In conjunction with the channelisation of creeks and removal of wetland vegetation, the quality of the water entering the ocean at McCauleys Beach would be negatively impacted. The existing sewerage pumping station at the site is currently operating at peak capacity. The addition of up to 700 dwellings could be expected to result in frequent overflows from the pumping station into the creek. Water quality at the beach would be reduced as a result of the development.
The Stocklands Development would provide a dormitory suburb for Sydney. With most of the residents working in Sydney, many will drive to work and back every day. This is not sustainable development, as it would add to greenhouse emissions and consume greater energy resources. The locating of a residential suburb, without the provision of suitable employment opportunities, is not sustainable or sensible.
The National Parks and Wildlife Service's Regional Parks Policy Statement says:
"In 1996 the Government amended the National Parks and Wildlife Act to create a new category of protected area to enable lands to be reserved as regional parks. The definition in the legislation specifies that a regional park is to include areas that have been substantially modified since European occupation and are:
The primary focus of regional parks is to provide open space and recreation, however, the protection of conservation values is also an important management aim.
It should be noted that mining is not allowed in regional parks, and as such the Illawarra Escarpment cannot be included as a part of the regional park whilst soever coal mining continues in the area. However, it can be reserved as a State Recreation Area, to provide recreation opportunities for the more agile and fit members of the community.
Illawarra is traditionally a region with high unemployment and low socio-economic benefits. The investment by the NSW Government of land purchase and set-up costs would be an investment in the future of sustainable development in the Illawarra. The benefits would extend along the length of the park from Thirroul to Kiama, and provide a gateway to the southern Illawarra region.
The proposed Stocklands development benefits only Stocklands and their shareholders. The real costs of the development would be borne by local residents, future generations and the environment.
further information contact the authors of this proposal: